Dr. Watson's Diagnosis
February 19, 2011
Now that IBM's Watson computer system has won Jeopardy, IBM is moving into computer-aided medical diagnosis. I'm surprised it has taken this long.
Medical diagnosis has been moving towards more and more "evidence-based medicine" and "Algorithmic-based medicine" which tend to somewhat mechanize the diagnostic process. Last month, a physician at Harvard recently told me that medical education is moving from "knowing" to "knowing where to find information". A few years ago, a professor at Harvard told me, "We don't encourage students to know what to do, we encourage them to know what to do next. The idea that a student should be able to leap to a diagnosis is misguided." A pediatric cardiologist who studied Electrical Engineering a year ahead of me at Caltech told me that studying medicine was more about memorization than the problem-solving techniques he'd learned as an engineer. He found that thinking through a problem was handicapping him against his fellow students who were doing a lot more rote learning.
My conclusion was that computers are superb at "memorization" and "algorithmic processing", and a time would come when computers could out-memorize, out-search and out-process many human physicians. Educating medical students to act like computers might be a losing strategy against computers that act like computers quite nicely already.
Now please count me as a skeptic on the general subject or artificial intelligence. So I don't make such arguments lightly. I first heard of computer aided diagnostics when my brother did a medical rotation at Stanford in the late '70s, so this has been a long road. Many customers have asked when our stethoscope will provide automated diagnosis and I've expressed great doubt about automated auscultation. A company tried to offer us such technology a few years ago, then went to a competitor and now seems headed for bankruptcy or a desperate buyout, after spending tens of millions of dollars on research.
I do, however, have faith in IBM's computer scientists. If a company with that depth of intellectual talent has decided to focus seriously on medical diagnostics, we could see some real progress.
This begs the question - how will medical education evolve when students can consult an App on their smartphones and get a REALLY RELIABLE diagnosis? More importantly - how will medicine evolve when patients can do the same?
Controlling the cost of medicine is going to come from a technological discontinuity. Tweaking the current system will be a failure, given the political and economic interests at stake. Watson may just be part of the solution.



May 6, 2019
February 27, 2017
April 21, 2016
March 25, 2016
March 18, 2016